When will the war in the Donbass end. Latest predictions about Novorossiya: how will the uprising in Donbass end? Should we expect full-scale hostilities

Seriously, when is it going to end?!

Let's see the answer to this question.

1) I will highlight the following fact: the current government of Ukraine (including the President of Ukraine) literally consults with American officials at every step, and unconditionally fulfills all their requirements and wishes.

The question is, what does this mean?

This obviously means only one thing: the real, real leaders of Ukraine today are not the President of Ukraine, and not the Government of Ukraine, but the leaders of the United States (US President, US Vice President, US Ambassador, etc.).

And this obviously means something else: the war in Ukraine will end not when the current leaders of Ukraine really want it, but when the US leaders (first of all, the US President) really want it.
The question is natural: when will the US leaders want to end the war in Ukraine?

In order to understand the answer to this question, first of all, it is worth noting the following fact: in the spring and summer of last year, the pro-American Government of Ukraine, which came to power as a result of the February coup, could well enter into direct negotiations with the residents of Donbass, and quite could negotiate and avoid the outbreak of war. But it did not do this, and after the arrival of a number of American officials in Ukraine (the Vice President of the United States, who was put in the chair of the President of Ukraine, the Director of the CIA, who came to Ukraine on someone else's passport, after which he justified himself for a long time, and a number of other official and unofficial American persons), a real massacre was unleashed in the Donbass.

What does this fact mean?

This fact means only one thing: it was the United States itself, with the help of its subordinate proteges in Ukraine, that unleashed (ordered to unleash) this massacre, this war in Ukraine.

This is no longer the above question, but the following question follows: when will the leaders of the United States, who unleashed a war in Ukraine (and also rendered very serious assistance to their proteges in the February coup d'état in Ukraine, and in coming to power), want to stop the unleashed them a war?

In answering this question, I will first of all note a few points.

First. It is quite obvious that any wars are unleashed not at all in order to stop them immediately, but are unleashed to achieve very specific goals (after which they stop).

Second. The leaders of the United States absolutely do not care about the well-being of Ukraine, and the people of Ukraine (as well as the inhabitants of many other countries). And if this were not so, then they would not unleash a war in Ukraine (as well as in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and a bunch of other states).

They are primarily interested in the well-being of their own country, their citizens, and their companies.

So there is no need to build illusions that the US wants to help Ukraine become an economically developed and prosperous state. They want to help themselves.

And third. A very characteristic feature of a significant part of the political elite in the United States (and in other Western countries) is the strongest pragmatism, complete unscrupulousness, and cynicism. This means that for many of them, "the end justifies the means."

And this means that;
- where you can deceive, they will definitely deceive (remember the promise of non-expansion of NATO to the East; etc.);
— where it is possible to be mean, they are sure to be mean (let us remember how quite recently they meanly, by signing written guarantees, deceived President Yanukovych, remember how meanly they deceived the same Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc.).

By the way, it is worth noting that the current leaders of Ukraine (Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, etc.) are clearly very diligent students of the above political elite. And what’s more, in my opinion, they have already far outdone them (because political meanness and deceit, both personal and through the media subordinate to them, they have made the norm of life in Ukraine).

So "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree."

What follows from these moments?

First of all, it directly follows from these moments that the United States unleashed a war in Ukraine (spitting on the people of Ukraine) not just for the sake of entertainment, but to achieve its very specific goals, directly related to the issue of strengthening and preserving the well-being of the United States, the well-being of citizens and US companies.

So, what are the goals pursued by the United States by unleashing a war in Ukraine?

2) The first goal. The United States has a huge public debt of $18 trillion, which, moreover, continues to grow steadily, at a rapid pace.

What is primarily dangerous for the US this debt, and its growth?

First of all, by the fact that it undermines confidence in the US dollar (to the global currency), and in the US economy, and it (its growth) at any moment can cause panic in the world currency markets, a sharp drop in the US dollar, followed by a complete collapse of the entire US economy.

Therefore, for the United States, this debt is the most real, primary, strategic danger, and therefore the United States today has a very urgent need to stop the growth of this debt and begin the process of reducing it.

How can I do that?

Since this debt is the debt of the United States, calculated in dollars (not in euros, not in rubles, but in dollars), then the United States, having a dollar printing press at its disposal, can theoretically simply print these 18 trillion dollars on a printing press, and pay off all that debt.

But here there is the following danger: in this case, in connection with the printing of dollars, the dollar exchange rate (in relation to all currencies) will inevitably begin to fall.

Naturally, in this case, all the owners of dollars (and they exist all over the world great amount- since the dollar is the world's currency) will begin to get rid of this falling dollar (just like the citizens of Russia recently got rid of the falling ruble, and just like the citizens of Ukraine today get rid of the falling hryvnia).

It is not difficult to understand that when printing a very large number of dollars on a printing press - with the inevitable prospect of a very strong fall in the dollar (the amount of debt is too large) - this ridding people, companies and states of the dollar will become not just massive, but will become panicky (the dollar, as and the hryvnia today will become unnecessary to anyone at all).

It is easy to understand that the consequence of this will be not only a strong, sharp, multiple, fall in the dollar and a drop in the standard of living of US residents, but also the collapse of the entire US economy.

Therefore, there is no way the United States can pay off the above debt by simply printing dollars on its printing press.

And in such a situation, what are they forced to do in order to stop the growth of debt, and to start reducing it?

It is easy to understand that in such a situation they have only one way out: by any means ("the end justifies the means") to ensure the growth of their American economy (the one that pays taxes to the American state budget), through this growth to ensure an increase in tax revenues to the budget United States, and by increasing these tax revenues, first stop the growth of public debt (this is the minimum task), and then begin to reduce this debt, with the prospect of its full repayment (this is the maximum task).

How can they ensure the growth of their economy (growth in the production of American goods and services)?

Obviously one of the most effective ways here is the conquest by US enterprises of new markets for their goods and services (the sale of goods and services in new states, and the expansion of their sale in old states).

And what markets can be conquered here?

I note that the US dollar is already a very strong currency. In the context of the expected growth of the US economy, the dollar will inevitably grow stronger, grow, even more (and the rate of other currencies will fall).

Under such conditions (the strengthening of the dollar, and the depreciation of other currencies), American enterprises (companies), in which workers receive an average of 2,000 US dollars (where labor is expensive), and which, in connection with this, produce very expensive for the poor states goods and services (due to the high wages of workers - the cost, and the price of goods produced by these workers becomes very high):
– will easily be able to sell their very expensive goods and services in the rich countries of the EU (where people also receive an average of $ 2,000 a month);
- and will not be able to sell their goods and services at all, for example, in poor Afghanistan (where people receive an average of $ 1 per month), in poor Ukraine (where people receive an average of $ 40 per month), and in many other poor countries ( where the local currency is very low and where there is a low standard of living for people and businesses).

It follows that the United States needs to conquer not some sales markets, such as Afghanistan, Africa, or Ukraine, but the conquest of a huge, and very rich, sales market called the "EU".

And what did the United States and its leaders decide to do to conquer this richest market? Have they decided to lower the prices of their goods and services (for example, their liquefied shale gas, and shale oil)? Or decided to improve the quality of their products?

No matter how (this path is very long, and not very effective). They decided to make everything much simpler: they simply decided by force, by force (“the end justifies the means”), to expel from Europe one of their competitors called “Russia” (who had a trade turnover with the EU of 500 billion dollars) from this market, and accordingly, take his place.

Indeed, how else can one kick out, for example, Gazprom, which sells gas for $300, and take its place with its own shale liquefied gas for $500?! Honestly, it will not work to expel him from Europe! Therefore, this can only be done by force, by force, and nothing else.

And how did they decide to achieve the above goal (by force, forcibly, expel Russia from Europe)?

Based on the events that have already taken place, it obviously follows that they decided to do this in the following way: under any pretext, overthrow President Yanukovych in Ukraine, unleash a civil war in Ukraine, and force Russia to send troops to Ukraine.

After that, Russia will inevitably be recognized as an aggressor, threatening the whole of Europe (NATO bloc), and after that, the states of Europe (which are all members of NATO), despite all their severe economic losses, willy-nilly, in order to ensure their security (energy security) from Russia, it will be necessary to apply economic sanctions against Russia, and curtail economic cooperation with Russia (with the aggressor).

Naturally, Russia's place in Europe should be taken by the United States (US enterprises and corporations), which will ensure the growth of the US economy and stop the growth (reduction) of the US public debt.

What did the US politicians not take into account in this plan of theirs?

First, it is worth noting here that the rupture of economic ties between Europe and Russia causes serious economic damage not only to Russia, but to the whole of Europe. Therefore, Europe, and first of all, the businessmen of Europe, clearly do not want this gap to arise (it incurs large losses for them, for example, farmers in Europe are already revolting from this).

Due to the above circumstance, a real break in the economic ties between Europe and Russia is possible only if there are very serious reasons, for example, if Russia carries out real, and not imaginary, aggression against Ukraine.

But Russia (and the US policy obviously did not expect this) showed restraint and did not send troops to Ukraine after all the events that had taken place. And in the Crimea, Russian troops have always been.

Thus, despite all the efforts of the United States, there were no real grounds for breaking off economic relations between Europe and Russia.

Secondly, the US politicians did not take into account one more thing. Europe in the 20th century experienced two terrible world wars. Because of this, the public of Europe, and of course, the politicians of Europe, very strongly, literally in a panic, do not want a new world war in Europe (it is difficult for Americans to understand this, since there has been no war on their territory for hundreds of years).

Well, the war in Ukraine (by the way, unlike the war in Yugoslavia) can easily draw both Russia and the states of Europe into a new, Third, world war in Europe (first, the supply of arms from both sides, then the arrival of military specialists from both sides, then the arrival of troops, for example, peacekeeping troops, to protect these specialists, and then direct military clashes, that is, a world war).

Because of this, politicians in Europe (unlike politicians from the United States) clearly do not need a war in Ukraine.

And by virtue of this fact, the politicians of Europe will in every possible way - despite the resistance of the hawks from the United States, and their puppets in Ukraine - seek to extinguish the flames of war in Ukraine.

And thirdly, politicians from the United States did not take into account one more thing. The rupture of economic ties with Russia will hit the European economy very hard. By virtue of the above, the euro exchange rate will inevitably begin to fall, but the dollar exchange rate will strengthen.

It is not difficult to understand that the result of this will be the transformation of Europe into one of the poorest sales markets (the income of Europeans will decrease from $2,000 to $500 a month) - after which American companies, with their strong dollar, will simply not be able to sell their goods in Europe because for their cost.

A similar situation will arise with a serious escalation of the war in Ukraine (increasing the danger of its spread to the rest of Europe).

3) The second goal. Dear reader! You have probably noticed with what maniacal persistence the current leaders of Ukraine, as well as the leaders of the United States and some European pro-American states (Poland, Lithuania, and others), endlessly, literally at every step, repeat "about Russia's aggression in Ukraine."

The question is, is it by chance?

No, this is not at all random, and it clearly indicates that these endless statements are nothing but an absolutely integral part of the above plan ("homemade").

Meaning this moment: US politicians clearly counted on the fact that Russia would definitely, with a 100% guarantee, send troops to Ukraine and become aggressors. Therefore, they firmly “built in” the statement “about Russia’s aggression in Ukraine” into their plan. And therefore - despite the real absence of Russian aggression in Ukraine - they are still forced (and where to go?) to widely (and, moreover, in the absence of real aggression) use in practice the above false statement, without which the entire above plan to break the economic ties of Europe and Russia in general becomes completely useless.

And now I will highlight the fact once again: US politicians very much counted on the fact that Russia would send its troops to Ukraine (and become an aggressor), as a result of which the US would have a real opportunity, contrary to Europe’s unwillingness, to completely break Russia’s strong economic ties with Europe, and thus achieve its first major goal.

And for what else, with what other main goal, did the US politicians need to achieve the entry of Russian troops into Ukraine?

Answering this question, I note that the current leadership of Russia, headed by V. Putin, has now completely refused to recognize the "leading and guiding" role of the United States in world affairs, has finally refused to recognize the idea of a "unipolar world" (led by a "beloved leader" USA), and moreover, through active measures to strengthen the defense potential of Russia (20 trillion rubles allocated until 2020 for the rearmament of the army), it has shown in practice its desire to be completely independent from the United States and build a multipolar world on the planet.

Naturally, the United States and its political elite did not like this very much, which (judging by the speeches of the President of the United States) clearly imagines itself to be a “God-chosen nation”, and which clearly dreams of creating a “unipolar world” on the planet (in fact, dreams of its world domination ).

In this regard, along with the goal of eliminating its 18 trillion debt, the US political elite inevitably arose another, second, most important (from their point of view) goal: to punish Russia (presumably, as a warning to other large states).

For comparison: if Russia today were obedient to the United States in everything, as it was in the 90s, then there is no doubt that the United States today would not pursue this goal.

To achieve this goal (to punish Russia), the United States obviously (it can be seen from all their actions today) decided:
— firstly, cause serious damage to the Russian economy, and due to this, make it impossible to implement the above program for the rearmament of the Russian army (and, accordingly, make it impossible to achieve real independence of Russia from the United States);
— and secondly, to replace the current Government of Russia, which is objectionable to them, headed by President V. Putin.

How did they decide to achieve the above?

It's easy to understand. to achieve all of the above, they again decided:
- on the one hand, with the help of a coup in Ukraine, unleashing a war in Ukraine, and drawing Russia into a war in Ukraine;
— and on the other hand, through the implementation of the "color revolution" in Russia with the use of pro-American (the same as now in Ukraine) Russian politicians.

In more detail, all this is as follows.

First. I would like to single out this fact: for 23 years, with the help of American NGOs, the nationalist, Nazi-Bandera ideology was propagated in Ukraine in a real way, and a huge number of Ukrainians (primarily young people) were literally brought up, and were really brought up, in the spirit of hatred. in relation to Russia (the battle cries of “Moskal to Gilyak”, “whoever doesn’t jump is that Muscovite”, statements about 300 years of slavery of Ukrainians while being part of Russia, statements about the “Holodomor”, etc. - all this, and many other things are not accidental, but are elements of educating people in Ukraine in the spirit of hatred for Russia).

For comparison: in relation to any other countries, for example, to Poland, or Belarus, and their inhabitants, similar calls and statements (for example, “to the Pole - to the Gilyak”, or “whoever does not jump - that Pole”) are not used in Ukraine .

What follows from this fact?

A very simple thing follows from this fact: with the introduction of Russian troops into Ukraine, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians throughout Ukraine, already besotted by the above education, would undoubtedly take up arms and actually fight against Russia, as a result of which Ukraine would become a real second for Russia " Afghanistan."

Naturally, a direct consequence of this would be the appearance in Russia of thousands of coffins with dead Russian soldiers, as well as the commission of a large number of terrorist acts by Bandera radicals in Russian cities.

Second. If Russia sent troops to Ukraine, a very painful (against the wishes of Europe), a strong, full-scale rupture of economic ties between Russia and Europe would inevitably occur, which would hit the Russian economy very hard.

There is no doubt that this blow to the Russian economy would have been intensified by the outbreak of the war with Ukraine, the severing of close economic ties between Russia and Ukraine, the introduction of various full-scale economic sanctions against Russia, targeted attacks on the ruble exchange rate, a targeted artificial reduction in the price of oil, and other measures. (everything is familiar, isn't it?).

Obviously, this would inevitably lead to the emergence of very serious difficulties in the rearmament of the army, and in matters of social security for the Russian population (the standard of living of people in Russia would be seriously reduced).

Third. It is quite obvious that thousands of coffins from the territory of Ukraine, and the strongest decline in the standard of living of Russian citizens, according to the plan of US politicians, should have sharply reduced the popularity of the V. Putin Government, and increased the popularity of pro-American opposition politicians in Russia, and should have created the most favorable conditions for conducting a "color revolution" in Russia.

After creating these favorable conditions, US politicians undoubtedly planned to carry out a number of specific measures to foment a "color revolution" in Russia. For example, demonstrative (not one, but several) murders of some prominent Russian opposition politicians before holding any mass anti-war, and other marches and demonstrations.

And after inciting the “color revolution”, it was clearly (following the example of Ukraine) that a campaign against the Kremlin was planned, and the overthrow of the Russian government headed by V. Putin.

Fourth. As a result of all this, the Russian economy would have been seriously damaged, the army rearmament program would have been disrupted, the government headed by V. Putin would have been overthrown, and pro-American politicians would have come to power in Russia.

And as a result of all this, the second main goal of the United States - the punishment of Russia - would be successfully achieved.

4) Thus, the United States, through the hands of its pro-American puppets in Ukraine, carried out a coup d'état and unleashed a war in Ukraine with two main goals:
- in order to reduce (stop growing) their huge 18 trillion debt;
- and with the aim of punishing Russia, by inflicting severe economic damage on it and overthrowing the Government of V. Putin.

For comparison:
– the EU countries supported the coup in Ukraine with the aim of bringing Ukraine into association with the EU, in order to expand their sales markets at the expense of Ukraine, and in order to ensure the further growth of their economy;
- some of the oligarchs in Ukraine supported the coup in order to "move away from the trough" other oligarchs who supported V. Yanukovych, take their place at the above trough, and thereby get even more profit for themselves.

Proceeding from what it directly follows: with so many people wishing to make a coup, V. Yanukovych was unequivocally doomed to a loss of power.

At the same time, it is worth noting that neither the first (the EU countries) nor the second (the oligarchs of Ukraine) clearly counted on unleashing a civil war in Ukraine. And the United States - counted, and knew exactly what it would be (because they themselves, in advance, in order to involve Russia in the war in Ukraine, decided to artificially kindle it with the help of their pro-American puppets).

The question is natural: has the US achieved its above goals?

No, they didn't. First of all, because Russia never sent its troops to Ukraine and did not become an aggressor.

And what follows from this? Does this mean that the US will want to end the war in Ukraine?

No, the US is unlikely to accept this kind of defeat, which means that in order to achieve its above goals, the US will continue to try to drag Russia into the war in Ukraine.

And what will they do about it?

Answering this question, I will note the following most important point: if suddenly Ukraine, on orders from the United States, decides to attack Russia (attack Crimea, for example, or attack by committing mass terrorist acts in Russian cities), then in this case, it is precisely Ukraine, not Russia, will become the aggressor.

Accordingly, in this case (even if Russia sends its troops to Ukraine in response), the United States will clearly not be able to achieve its goals. Because the aggressor here will be Ukraine, not Russia.

This means that this option of involving Russia in the war in Ukraine is unacceptable for the United States.

On the other hand, I note that if the United States wants to involve Russia in the war in Ukraine through the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine (and even more so through their participation in the war in Donbass), which is absolutely unacceptable for Russia and for its security, then in In this case, there is a real danger not only of the introduction of Russian wax into Ukraine, but also the danger of a world war in Europe.

Since the whole of Europe, including its policies, is very much afraid of the outbreak of such a war, and does not want it, and since any actions of the United States aimed at unleashing such a war in Europe (including the supply of American weapons to Ukraine) can lead to a catastrophic gap in relations between the US and Europe (after which the US will have to forget about the EU market, and at the same time about NATO for a long time), then this option is also unacceptable for the US.

Based on the existence of such a situation, it clearly follows that the United States has only one way out - to involve Russia in the war in Ukraine, and to achieve its goals - to constantly ignite and constantly support the war in the Donbass, while not just setting it on fire, and in every possible way to encourage the strongest cruelty (both military and economic) in relation to the civilian population of Donbass and the rest of Ukraine, in such a way that Russia still one day could not withstand this lawlessness, and in order to save the civilian population of Donbass (and all of Ukraine ) from the real genocide, nevertheless sent its troops to Ukraine, and became a real aggressor.

It is precisely this (the kindling of war and Nazi cruelty towards the civilian population of both Donbass and the rest of Ukraine) that is now being actively pursued by order of the United States, their pro-American puppets in Kyiv, in connection with which, I note the following:
- Supporters of Bandera and Shukhevych during the Great Patriotic War, very diligently and with great zeal, destroyed the inhabitants of Ukraine (primarily Jews and communists) for the glory of "great" Germany and Hitler;
- now, having come to power in Ukraine, they are again destroying the inhabitants of Ukraine with great zeal (residents of Donbass, mobilized in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as pensioners and the unemployed of Ukraine). But now they are doing it for the glory of "great" America and Obama.

Proceeding from this fact, as well as from the fact of the complete collapse of the Ukrainian economy, it follows that they simply do not know how to do anything but one thing: diligently serve the owner.

The question is natural: and how long will this incitement of war, and the war itself, in the Donbass, and the destruction of the inhabitants of Ukraine (in order to involve Russia in the war in Ukraine), continue?

Obviously, this will continue as long as pro-American and pro-Western politicians are in power in Ukraine, who unquestioningly carry out the orders of US politicians.

Accordingly, as soon as either pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian politicians come to power in Ukraine (Russia also absolutely does not need a war in Ukraine, for many reasons), who refuse to follow orders from Washington, the real process of ending the war in Ukraine will immediately begin.

And this is absolutely fair, given the fact that the DNR and LNR initially, from the very beginning, were never “separatists”, but were (and still remain to some extent today) only supporters of a deep federalization of Ukraine, which directly means only one thing: it is still possible to negotiate with them.

Thus, I emphasize once again, until pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian politicians come to power in Ukraine, and until pro-American politicians are in power in Ukraine, peace is unlikely to come to Donbass. Since the US has not achieved its above goals. And since the United States (and especially their President) does not like to retreat.

5) The question is natural: which of the Ukrainian politicians (who should be removed from power in Ukraine) should be classified as pro-American politicians?

Firstly, they must include all, without exception, the oligarchs of Ukraine, and all other rich people in Ukraine (including government officials) who keep their money in Western banks, who own real estate in the West, who have citizenship of Western countries (and the United States) who teach their children in the West who are being treated there, and so on.

All of them naturally do not want to lose their huge money, real estate, citizenship, the opportunity to teach their children in the West, and so on. - and therefore (since the United States itself, or through its NATO allies, can always take away all these benefits from them), all of them, under the threat of losing their benefits, will unquestioningly comply with all the requirements of US politicians, and all of them are unconditionally pro-American politicians ( even if they are not involved in politics at all).

Secondly, they must include all politicians without exception. public figures and journalists who receive financial grants from American and European NGOs, from the hands of the American ambassador (receiving cookies from the hands of American politicians), since they all clearly do not want (especially in conditions of severe unemployment in Ukraine) to lose their income, and since , because of this reason, all of them will undoubtedly fulfill all the requirements of US politicians.

Thirdly, they must also include all politicians, public figures and journalists who receive money from the above oligarchs, who (because of the threat of losing their income) will undoubtedly fulfill all the requirements of the above oligarchs, and therefore all the requirements of US politicians. .

Fourthly, it is certainly necessary to include all those citizens of Ukraine and other countries who are secretly or openly employees of the US intelligence services.

And fifthly, it is certainly necessary to include all members of the pro-Bandera organizations (supporters of Bandera and Shukhevych), who, on the one hand, since 1945 (after leaving the subordination and feeding, the German Abwehr and the SS) are on the money, and on the other , contentment of the American CIA, and who, on the other hand, because of their fierce hatred of Russia, are ready to carry out any orders, from anyone, as long as they are directed to the detriment of Russia.

Only the removal from power in Ukraine of all the above pro-American (pro-Western) politicians who follow the orders of US politicians (acting in the interests of the United States, and contrary to the interests of Ukraine, and the inhabitants of Ukraine), and only the coming to power of pro-Ukrainian (or pro-Russian) politicians who need a war in Ukraine absolutely not needed - only this can really end the war in Ukraine.

And only this will completely eliminate the threat of a Third World War in Europe.

In conclusion, I would very much like to ask the European politicians, and the Ukrainian oligarchs who supported the coup d'état in Ukraine, the following question: did you guys achieve your goals? And do you sleep well now at night - in the context of the existence of a real threat of a Third World War in Europe, before the start of which the parties have only a few steps to go?

Answer honestly, at least to yourself, this question.

And to better answer, I will note this fact: for the Third World War, we already have:
- and the warring parties (groupings) were clearly identified (on the one hand, the United States with its allies from NATO, and on the other hand, Russia with its allies);
- and the front line - the real one (somewhere in the region of Donetsk and Lugansk) - appeared.

It remains only to bring the main forces into battle.

After that, not only the Ukrainian people, but the whole world will regret that President V. Yanukovych did not disperse the Maidan in time.

Where does modern international terrorism come from?

Operation Mockingbird: how the CIA seized control of the media

Partner News

People who consider themselves pacifists are fighting on both sides of the conflict and are preparing to respond to the pogroms in Ukraine

"Where are you wandering now?" - when a gypsy woman starts a conversation with such a question, it seems to me that it means a certain degree of trust. This is a question for your own, a person who is on the road and in search of happiness. “Yes,” I answer, “now I am wandering between Moscow and Donetsk.” “Ours are both there and there, ours are everywhere,” states Louise Pearl, the leader of the Donetsk Theater of Gypsy Song "Shatritsa", with whom we agreed to meet at the iconic deli of the capital of the DPR with the indestructible name "Moscow".

Paths of the Byzantine Wizards

Louise has a charming white-toothed smile and a calling card that you don't see very often. On one side, a black horse, two guitarists, two artistic ladies in bright outfits, of course, telephones, e-mail and all the “bells and whistles” bestowed by advanced technologies like skype or viber. On the other hand, a proposal to turn to a bioenergy therapist to tell fortunes on Tarot cards, remove damage, the evil eye, bad luck and acquire talismans for good luck. Great, right?

The former head of the press service of Shakhtar returned to his former place of work In addition to all her talents, Luiza Zhemchuzhnaya is also an activist in a women's gypsy organization, the leader of which she volunteered to introduce me to. We climbed up to a tiny office not far from the Donetsk "Moskva", hung with gypsy flags with an ever-rolling wheel. “The main gypsy of Donbass” was waiting for us there. Natalia Varakuta, chairman of the Donetsk cultural and educational society of Roma women "Miriklya". To be clear, “miricle” means “beads”. Such a philosophical name for itself, they say, every woman is a bead, and when they are united by one goal, a necklace is obtained. Beautiful, romantic, by the way, and practical too.

We talked for a long time because it was interesting. To me, anyway. And the gypsy women were patient with the guest. Basically, Natalia Varakuta spoke in an excellent teaching voice. Louise Zhemchuzhnaya added remarks, bright, quite suitable for performances from the stage. It all seemed that now she would sing. No, she held back.

— Ma'am, are there any other gypsy organizations in Donetsk besides yours?

“Miriklya” has existed since 2004. We were lucky, the organization was registered just on April 8th. In total, 9 Roma public organizations worked in the Donetsk region before the war. But there is only one female.

- It's International Roma Day.

- From time immemorial, it was customary to say "gypsies." The same Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin, our everything, wrote, they say, “gypsies roam in Bessarabia in a noisy crowd.” Again, the films were shot by "Gypsy", "Gypsy Aza". Operetta "The Gypsy Baron". And it was accepted as normal. But now more and more emphasis is being placed, they say, not gypsies, but Roma, Roma people. What is it connected with? You obviously know better how to speak and write correctly.

- Abroad, in Europe, for example, it is customary to say "Roma" (Natalia singsongly emphasizes the last syllable). Roma is a man, Romni is a woman, and all together - Roma - plural. But in Russian tradition it is customary to say gypsies, and this is not offensive. A representative of the Gypsy Museum from Germany came to us and said that it is not customary for them. "Cygoiner" is a wandering thief. That's the way it is in the Western tradition. But in our country no one is offended by being called a gypsy or a gypsy.

Where did the word "jeepsy" come from? Music lovers are well aware of the group "Gypsy Kings".

It means "Egyptian". Concept from history. When the gypsies left India, they went a little further north, there was Byzantium.

- Indeed, a little to the north and west.

- In those places, the gypsies lived and lived for 400 years. In Byzantium there was a province called Egypt Minor. The name "Gypsy", that is, "Egyptians", arose. There is a version that the word "gypsies" comes from "atsinganos" - fortunetellers, wizards. So they were called by the Byzantine Greeks. The name has taken root, slightly changed, but now we use it.

The world - the world, the gypsies - money

The luxury and emptiness of the Donbass Arena: the fifth year without football (Photo report) - A fascinating excursion into history and ethnography. But let's get closer to the present. I came to you to try to figure out how the gypsies live today in the Donbass, in the DPR in the conditions of war.

- The gypsies live a little better than the rest ...

- This is a sudden turn, I did not expect.

“Nothing surprising. Gypsies stick together. Families tend to support each other. No one pushes either the elder or the younger off the table. There are laws and traditions, a closed space. People live in the state, but a little apart.

“But something tells us that the war added difficulties anyway.

— It became very difficult to earn a pretty penny. Grandfathers and grandmothers are now, alas, leaving for another world, but they could still live. It has to do with psychosomatics. Actually, this applies not only to the elderly, but also to the young - oncology is doing its job. There were also shells hitting gypsy houses. We had a situation when, during the shelling, a mother and a child ran to hide in the basement. And this young woman's heart stopped from fear. There are people in Petrovka (one of the most affected districts of Donetsk - author's note), whose housing burned down, they were left without documents, without anything. Actually, we have everything, like all other residents of Donetsk.

Are people leaving?

Yes, they go to work. Entire ethnic groups left at the very beginning of the war. And they did it right. There was a compact settlement, only the inhabitants left it, as soon as they began to fly in and get there.

- You felt it, didn't you?

The third eye worked. They moved to the Ivanovo region, to Yegorievsk, to Moscow. And someone left for Zhytomyr. Where there are relatives, we went there.

Here Louise Zhemchuzhnaya jumped on her favorite skate, in a figurative, understandable sense: “When we feel bad, we sing and dance. When it’s good, we sing and dance all the more.”

“Understood,” I say, “Here I figured out what the difference is between Russians and gypsies. Gypsies dance in any case, and Russians drink - out of grief or joy.

“Of course,” Louise agrees, “they drink and we dance for them. But, of course, it’s better to call the gypsies when it’s good.”

Natalia Varakuta sums up a sudden study of Russian-gypsy relations in conditions of grief and joy: “When a baby is born, you need to prepare him in advance, what he will do when he is good and when he is bad. There is a saying: "Peace to the world, money to the gypsies." That's why we are the most pacifists."

Scout Budulai, Yashka the Gypsy and other heroic Roma

- When I went to this meeting, I was thinking about the images of gypsies in the cinema. And I remembered two characters who fought. This is Budulai, according to the scenario, he is a front-line soldier, a scout. And Yashka the gypsy from The Elusive, also a scout, only in the Civil War...

In Kyiv, the gypsies honored the memory of their compatriots killed with flowers and songs. Photo essay - It's in the movies. And in life, many gypsies fought. Was a Moscow writer, researcher, ethnographer and artist Nikolay Bessonov He, unfortunately, is no longer with us. He wrote a book about gypsies in the Great Patriotic War (“Gypsy tragedy 1941-1945. Facts, documents, memories” - ed.)

We also sent him our stories, one of which was included in the book. When we go to rallies to the pit near the third hospital (during the Great Patriotic War, the German fascists tortured and threw many residents of Donbass into the pit - ed.), so people were killed there of different nationalities. One old gypsy woman told me that when they raised the corpses to the surface, they found a piece of their father's jacket, and only from it they determined that he died there. Even now, this horror gives me goosebumps. Gypsies have it written in their subcortex that it is impossible to deprive a person of life. Only God can do it.

- Now there is a war in Donbass. Gypsies are involved in this conflict with weapons in their hands?

- Unfortunately, yes, from the very beginning. And on the one hand, and on the other hand. It is clear with ours - when they come to your house, you need to protect your family. This situation is already hopeless. And on the other side, a lot of feelings wake up in people when they are told that Ukraine was attacked. This is where misinformation comes in.

- Quite recently, a large-scale gypsy action was held in Kyiv ...

- Yes, it was timed to coincide with the day of the Roma Holocaust, when about 3 thousand gypsies were burned in the ovens of Auschwitz in one night. People from all over Ukraine gathered to express their grief at the monument in Babi Yar, to hold a requiem concert in the Mariinsky Park. After all these murders...

- Do you mean the most recent gypsy pogroms in Ukraine?

- Certainly. After that there were pickets. Letters were written to international organizations. Raised lawyers. They did everything they could. Now there was an attempt to reach through the soul. Therefore, a requiem concerto. People must understand that we live in the same society and are not enemies to each other.

Have you been invited to these events?

We were invited, but we decided not to go.

- Why?

- If there are Roma who fought on the other side, and then we will arrive ... How do you imagine it? It won't be good.

Response to gypsy pogroms

- A whole series of tragedies swept across Ukraine, when the gypsy camps were destroyed, moreover, in the most cruel way. The general course of events says that these are not random occurrences, but a system. What do your fellow tribesmen from the other side say about this? There is, I believe, such a phenomenon as "gypsy mail".

Our Roma are also different. There are very educated, civilized. You look and by the look you will never determine that they are gypsies. There are scientists, professors. Some of them hide their nationality.

“Prejudice still exists in society. And there are others, say, refugees from our region. When the war started, someone went to Ukraine, decided that it would be safer there, that there was salvation. Some stopped in the Goloseevsky district, but no one is waiting for them there. There is no money to pay for housing, but you also need to somehow feed the children. So they set up their tents. They were driven out of there. Then there were cases in Lviv and Transcarpathia. There is a very musical family, a whole dynasty ... The dead boy also played the guitar. The Nazis came at night and began to kill them.

- Did such pogroms come as a surprise to you?

Russian gypsies are outraged by the pogroms in Ukraine - When the war began, it was clear that it would definitely come to this. At first, we, living in the Donbass, suddenly became different, dissidents for many in the Ukrainian community. This was welcomed by the authorities, warmed up. Now they found who is to blame - the gypsies! Moreover, they are socially unprotected, illiterate, who do not know how to write a statement to the police.

- It may turn out that such pogroms will continue, how should Ukrainian gypsies act? Leave for Donbass or Russia?

From the very beginning of 2014, a difficult economic situation has been observed in Ukraine. Political problems are caused by the ATO and the transition of Crimea to the Russian Federation. No wonder so many people are interested Will the war in Ukraine end in 2018?. The answers to existing questions are provided by predictors with developed intuition.

Despite the complexity of the anti-terrorist operation in the Donbass and the existing occupied territories, full-scale military operations should not be expected. It is important to note that many citizens believe that the ATO is a war, because the operation to liberate the territories cannot last more than three weeks. In this regard, one should carefully study the existing situation and understand what its consequences may be.

Features of the situation in the Donbass

Ukrainians and Russians often try to study latest news on when the war in Ukraine will end 2018. It is noted that calm periods are sometimes replaced by bursts. This is how the situation has evolved over the past few years.

The prolonged war in Ukraine leads to negative manifestations in all spheres of the state economy:

the level of life support of society is getting lower;
there is economic instability;
many families from the Donbass lost their homes and robots, were forced to leave their homes.

Residents of all regions, regions and cities of Ukraine note that these events could not remain without publicity. Now every citizen is worried about their future, understanding the potential difficulties that may arise during the long-term development of the operation in the Donbass. As a result, there is much speculation about what the impact on the economies of other settlements Ukraine. The forecasts of political scientists and psychics, astrologers are amenable to discussion.

What do leading experts say?

In 2015-2016, there were various assumptions regarding the military operation. The predictions diverged significantly over time. Now experts are trying to take into account the specifics of the situation in order to make more reliable forecasts and maintain public confidence.

The deputies are confident that the military conflict between Ukraine and Russia will continue to exist. At the same time, some experts are convinced that the situation will sooner or later lead to a humanitarian catastrophe. At the same time, representatives of military organizations are convinced that a peaceful situation can be established in mid-2019. Thus, it will take about five years after the start of the ATO.

Similar news:

Pavel Globa, without a doubt, opens his point of view. One of the most famous and powerful astrologers of the 21st century believes that the current situation will continue until 2020. The specialist is confident that real chaos will occur in 2019, since it is during this period that the height of the conflict will take place.

Pavel Globa notes the following manifestations related to politics and ATO in the next few years:

public propaganda;
political inconsistencies;
dissemination of false information through mass media;
disorientation;
national problems.

Thus, the first couple of years of the ATO will no longer be the most terrible. About how it develops war in Ukraine, latest news inform regularly. One can guess that in the future periods of exacerbation and calm will continue to replace each other.

What do psychics and astrologers say?

What do they say psychics about when the war in Ukraine will end? It is not surprising that this issue worries those citizens who are worried not only for their well-being, but also for the country.

Alena Zelibora is confident that the military conflict will be over after the parties concerned understand the futility of the situation and begin to act differently. Ukraine can survive a new coup, reminiscent of the Maidan. After cardinal changes in the political and military sphere, the eastern regions will decide to return to the country with the acquisition of their former rights.
Alena Kurilova believes that chaos will pass after a woman becomes the main person in government. It is the lady who will help to ensure that the two enemy countries, Ukraine and Russia, go for rapprochement. The gradual restoration of relations between the parties will allow a change in policy in better side, strengthen the economy.
Sergei Shevtsov believes that the military conflict will end in 2019. Uranus is currently in the constellation of Aries, so peaceful resolution of issues remains impossible. Psychic Khayal Alekperov agrees with such a prediction, and he specifies that the state banner is on fire and there is a man holding the earth in his hands nearby.
Shaman Dondukov is in no hurry to name the exact date. At the same time, he is confident that the war will end in Crimea, which is included in Russia. The specialist is convinced that a peaceful end to the conflict is impossible. Shaman Dondukov is afraid of strong bloodshed and a huge blow to the economy of both states. Only a woman leader will bring Ukraine to a new level, contributing to the successful resolution of the conflict.

Numerous predictions about when will the war in Ukraine 2018 end from psychics are still unreliable and unverified. It can be assumed that Ukraine and Russia will have to endure serious trials before politicians get along with each other again.

In 2017, the news on the ATO is still relevant. Most likely, nothing will change in the coming months. Updates appear regularly, and they inform that opponents often lead to an escalation of an existing conflict. What news has appeared recently?

The militants repeatedly fired at Ukrainian posts using various weapons. The most dangerous is GRAD, which is also regularly used. They try not to report on some cases of the use of weapons, since such situations would lead to an official violation of international conventions and agreements reached.
The occupied territories are often left without the benefits of civilization and communication means. Residents of Donbass, who had to stay in their homeland, are forced to live without light, heat, water. It is not surprising that the local population is looking forward to the resolution of the military conflict and sincerely believes that comfort will still be returned.
Residents of many settlements of Donbass are forced to face serious restrictions on access to regular transport. Despite volunteer support, the problem still exists.
Avdiivka most often appears in the news. The area used to be prosperous, but now it regularly faces shelling. The population of Avdiivka is most likely accustomed to living in constant tension.
The news often reports the death or injury of the Ukrainian military. Even if the soldiers manage to survive at first, the operations are ineffective.

Such news items appearing on radio, television and on the Internet cause emotional stress. It is not surprising that the question of will there be a Russia-Ukraine war, worries many residents of the two enemy countries. Fortunately, in a couple of years the military conflict did not develop into a serious war.

Numerous predictions of how the war in Ukraine 2018 will end, warn that full-scale hostilities throughout the territory of both countries should not be expected. At the same time, the Russians and Ukrainians should learn a serious lesson from the current situation, so the tests are not over yet.

Vanga at the end of the last century foresaw a conflict between the Slavic peoples. The woman was sure that she would not do without weapons. Most likely, the conflict will be prolonged due to the "blindness" of both peoples. Each side will gain confidence that it is at war with its enemy.

Globa is convinced that there will never be a war between Ukraine and Russia. Despite numerous stressful periods, the astrologer is 100% sure of his prediction. In addition, Pavel Globa believes that there is a chance of creating a new republic with the inclusion of Ukraine and Russia. Military expert Igor Koziy agrees with Pavel Globa. It is believed that economic problems that appear in the history of both states will not allow the development of war.

Experts also note that frequent and unreliable news about the military conflict in Donbass leads to serious problems in society. The main objective of such an information attack is to introduce the local population into a special tension.

So, When will the 2018 war end? You can believe that positive news will certainly appear in the very near future. One or two years should solve the current situation. In this converge, as astrologers and psychics, and political scientists, military experts.

For reconciliation, Ukraine must survive the coup and the approval of certain bills in order to reform the entire political system. This is confirmed by the renaming of streets, the demolition of communist parties. Psychics believe that this will have a negative impact on the energy level of the planet, but at the same time it will allow you to step over the military conflict.

How reliable can prediction when the war in Donbass will end 2018? Everything depends on how quickly the fraternal peoples, Russians and Ukrainians, will be able to take a fresh approach to assessing the existing issue. There are still chances for a successful solution of all political and military issues in the near future.

At the moment, this is the only and fundamental document for resolving the crisis in Donbass. Since the signing of the first Minsk agreements, many politicians and experts, especially in Ukraine, continue to criticize these documents, but at the same time, during this time they have not been able to formulate a more or less adequate alternative to them. Simply put, the vast majority of critics state that the agreements are not optimal, but there is no alternative to them.

The main problem lies not in the quality of the Minsk agreements and their semantic content, but in the applied implementation. If we consider the implementation of the Minsk agreements in comparison with similar initiatives in other conflicts of recent decades, we can state that we are only at the beginning of a difficult and painful path leading to a complete cessation of the conflict.

No matter how much you want to end the conflict and return to peaceful life as quickly as possible, in the conflicts of recent decades you can see extremely negative examples of how a peace plan was first imposed, and then it turned out that it simply did not work. Bosnia and Herzegovina is such an example. In 1995, after a brutal civil war between Serbs, Croats and Muslims (back in Yugoslavia, Muslims were singled out as a separate ethnic group, most of them were Serbs who converted to Islam during the control of the territories of the Balkan Peninsula by the Ottoman Empire) and peace enforcement by Western states the Dayton Accords were signed. These agreements described in great detail the structure of the new state, the relationship between the main ethnic groups, and the Constitution of BiH was an appendix to them. But a small nuance was not taken into account - they were completely divorced from reality. As a result of their adoption, an even greater conflict was brewing. As a result, the position of High Representative (Special Representative of the European Union) was introduced with dictatorial powers that clearly contradict democratic norms: the High Representative has the right to make decisions binding on all Bosnian authorities, to remove any official from office, to prohibit any person from participating in elections and holding any “elected or appointed public office, as well as office in political parties”. This post still exists today. The problem is that at the moment BiH is once again becoming a "powder keg" of Europe, since now there are three separate realities there: Serbian, Croatian and Muslim. For the past 22 years, these realities have developed separately from each other, and in a clearly confrontational direction. And now, as a result, there is a very high potential for conflict in BiH, which can detonate at any moment.

A comparison of the conflicts of recent decades leads to an unequivocal conclusion - progress in the implementation of peace initiatives exists only in cases where there are direct negotiations between the parties to the conflict. If such negotiations are not conducted, conflicts most often turn into "frozen". An example here is the Abkhaz-Georgian, Ossetian-Georgian and Armenian-Azerbaijani conflicts.

It is also quite indicative that the main driving force of modern conflicts is radical nationalism, which provokes people to a policy of discrimination and the destruction of dissidents. This started the conflicts in Donbass, Cyprus, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, BiH, Transnistria, Kosovo and Metohija, Nagorno-Karabakh, Croatia, Rwanda and Macedonia.

Separately, it should be said about the time frame for the settlement of conflicts in modern world. In the vast majority of cases, this process is quite long-term. Thus, the settlement of the situation in Cyprus lasts 44 years, in Western Sahara - 27 years, in Transnistria, Nagorno-Karabakh and South Ossetia - 25 years, in Abkhazia - 23 years.

In almost all conflicts of our time, there is or has been a topic related to the introduction of peacekeeping contingents. As you know, in early September 2017, President of the Russian Federation Putin came up with a peacekeeping initiative in the framework of the conflict in Donbass regarding the involvement of the UN contingent, which should ensure the safety of members of the permanent monitoring mission in Donbass. Realizing the positive consequences of the initiative of the Russian president, the Ukrainian and Western partners, who do not want an end to the conflict, tried to shift the discussion to the plane of the need to send a peacekeeping contingent to the Donbass. Moreover, the Ukrainian side, which is interested in the return of the territories, but not the population, sees the deployment of a peacekeeping contingent on the border of Russia and the LDNR as the main goal, where there are no hostilities. Considering the experience of recent decades regarding the effectiveness of the introduction of a peacekeeping contingent on the example of other conflicts, it can be argued that in most cases peacekeepers turned out to be ineffective, and in some conflicts they became one of the causes of mass deaths of citizens. Here we should recall the situation with the UN peacekeeping contingents in Serbian Krajina, Kosovo and Metohija, Rwanda and the Central African Republic.

At the moment, one should not hope that the Minsk agreements will be fully implemented in the short term (1-3 years), as there are a number of factors that prevent this. This is the position of the leadership of Ukraine, the global geopolitical situation, the legal and legal features of the documents. But at the same time, there is a discreet hope that within the framework of the negotiation process between the Special Representative of the US State Department for Ukraine Volker and Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation Surkov, the parties will be able to find compromise formats for interaction regarding the implementation of the Minsk agreements, especially since the essence of these negotiations cannot be influenced Ukrainian representatives who do not want to fulfill their obligations.

The current geopolitical situation in the world cannot leave anyone indifferent. Those international relations that have been formed in the country, on the continent and the world as a whole directly affect the life of everyone to a certain extent. That is why a person's interest in the future, however, as always, is especially significant. Our attention is also drawn to the events unfolding in Ukraine.

When will there be peace in Ukraine?

The current state of affairs is the ensuing consequences of a number of decisions made and a combination of circumstances. It all began with the crisis of 2014 or even 2013, with the start of mass protests in Kyiv. Further change of power and as a result - war. The ruthless conflict in the east of the country has already claimed more than one thousand human lives. And the geopolitical situation around the war heated up to the limit. So, some political scientists and quite prominent politicians believe that if the armed conflict does not stop, then a third world war may begin because of it.

It is this situation that makes many turn to the stars, maps, horoscopes and other things in order to find out: what will happen to Donbass and the world as a whole? The fate of millions of people depends on it.

Predictions about the future of Ukraine vary quite a lot: from pessimistic to quite positive, giving hope for a speedy peace.

For example, Ukrainian astrologer from Odessa, Vlad Ross, sees the future of his country in a rather positive, optimistic way. He claims that:

Donetsk and Lugansk will soon return to the country, this condition will contribute to the establishment of peace in the region and the republic as a whole. According to him, this should happen in 2019.
When there is peace in Ukraine, the country will begin to develop rapidly and build a new, democratic society. The current crisis will end.
There is also a hint of pessimism in his forecasts. Thus, the stars promise Ukraine a change in power as a result of early elections. This is due to the fact that the sphere responsible for prosperity will be influenced by Mars. It is this warlike planet that will lead to a split in the already formed political elite.
As a result of the elections, new, strong people will come to power, who will begin to lead the country out of the recession.
Regarding the Crimea, Ross answers firmly - the peninsula can no longer be returned.

It is worth paying attention to the fact that Ross predicts not the most enviable fate of Russia. According to him, the federation is waiting for the collapse and a long period of instability.

Prediction for Donbass from Pavel Globa

This fairly well-known soothsayer earned considerable popularity during the Soviet era. This is due to the high level of accurate forecasts for the future. Of course, he could not pass by in relation to Ukraine. So, Pavel Globa made a forecast for the future of the country back in 2009. Then he said that Ukraine was waiting for the collapse into three completely independent regions:

The Western region, which, over time, will quarrel with all the surrounding countries.
The Republic of Crimea, which will be integrated into the Russian Federation (which has already happened).
The eastern part, which will also become part of the Russian Federation, but not immediately. This will be preceded by significant obstacles, both politically and legally.

It is worth noting: Pavel Globa's forecasts come true with an accuracy of 85%. This indicator indicates a high degree of reliability of his words. But what will happen to Donbass in 2019?

According to Globa, 2019 will not bring anything good and no positive changes. The conflict will continue at today's level. This will bring grief and suffering to people on both sides of the divide. Peace talks will also fail, as they simply won't work in practice.

When will there be peace in Donbass? The psychic does not give unambiguous statements in this regard. He does not name a specific date for the end of the war. However, in his opinion, peace is still possible. But, this will happen with the change of the ruling regime. According to him, the new leader must convince the citizens of the country of the futility of a policy aimed at confrontation with Donetsk specifically and Russia in particular. Only then will the long-awaited peace come to the country.

Donbass predictions from Vanga

When will there be peace in Ukraine? This question can also be addressed to such an authoritative Bulgarian soothsayer as Vanga, a prediction that lives to this day, even after her death.

Vanga did not leave many prophecies regarding Ukraine, moreover, analyzing what she said, one must understand that the clairvoyant used quite figurative and metamorphic ways of presenting what she “saw”. That is why researchers have to decipher her words.

Vanga spoke about Ukraine in the context of the entire Eastern European region. Interpreters claim that she predicted great troubles for this region: an endless struggle for power, the impoverishment of peoples, and armed conflicts. However, this is exactly what is happening now.

But, the Bulgarian clairvoyant, despite all the gloom of the forecasts, was optimistic. And she talked about the change of power. The leader in this region will be a certain person, whom she called "Sagittarius", it is he who will be able to unite the previously divided peoples. With his arrival, the spiritual revival of the region will begin. Thus, on the question of what will happen to the Donbass, Vanga's predictions do not carry any specifics. At the same time, there is hope for a new leader who will change the situation.

Predictions about Donbass: Julia Wang

Julia Wang is a famous soothsayer from Latvia. Most of her prophecies relate to the EU, but she also made several high-profile prophecies about the conflict in the Donbass and the future of Ukraine:

According to Julia, Kiev will not be able to return either Crimea or Donetsk.
She also believes that serious shocks await Ukraine, which will lead to the complete collapse of the republic, and its parts will go under the protectorate to other states. Moreover, Wang believes that such a development of events will be beneficial. Since it is after this that prosperity will begin on the territory of the former country.
At the same time, serious geopolitical changes will take place in the EU, which is why the leaders of Europe will not be up to Ukrainian problems.

Predictions for the Donbass: other soothsayers Vera Lyon, Alexey Pokhabov, Olga

Vera Lyon is a clairvoyant, who is often called the "Kazakh Vanga". She makes predictions based on vivid images. So, Vera sees Ukraine in the form of a dry tree, bleeding with an unusual red resin. This vision clearly does not mean anything good. According to Vera Lyon, in 2019 one should not expect a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Moreover, she predicts Ukraine will soon break up into several parts, and relations with Russia, at the same time, will only worsen.

Alexey Pokhabov, the winner of the Battle of Psychics, after a long meditation, made a new prediction about the Donbass. The clairvoyant claims that 2019 may bring a new war to Europe. Calls for peace talks to begin now, otherwise a very large number of people will die. And mostly new round armed conflict will lead to disastrous consequences for the European Union. According to him, Ukrainian nationalist-minded people can unleash a war on two fronts - against Donetsk and Europe.

Predictions for the Donbass were also made by a witch who calls herself Olga. In her opinion, the Ukrainian authorities continue to deceive their people, and in fact, the culprits of the war in the east are today's ruling elite. She is sure that in 2019 we will face a new round of confrontation in Donetsk, but it will be sudden, as there will be a riot in Kyiv, as a result of which the power will change. As a result, a strong leader will come who will stop the bloodshed and lead Ukraine to prosperity.

conclusions

Peace in Ukraine, when will it be? It is quite difficult to answer this question unambiguously, even after analyzing all the predictions and prophecies. Only one thing is clear: the end of the war will be only after peace negotiations and the implementation of all the agreements reached.

The future of Ukraine depends solely on the people who live here, and only sanity can help the state survive and get out of the recession.